Skip to main content

Rethinking Music Streaming: Should Listening Time = Payout Time?

🎧 Rethinking Music Streaming: Payouts and User-Centric Systems

I recently posted a question online asking what one thing people would change about music streaming services, and I've received some really insightful responses! I know we all have issues with streaming services, and I wanted to talk about some of the suggestions I received.

In the vlog, I discuss a response that proposed a change to how artists' plays are counted:

  • The Suggestion: Payouts should be based on the amount of time spent listening to a track or album, rather than just the total number of clicks or plays.
  • Example: This idea suggests that a longer piece of music, like a 15-minute concept track, shouldn't generate the same payout as an album composed of multiple shorter tracks that add up to the same total listening time. In short, a 10-minute song should potentially earn more monetization than a 3-minute song, based on the dedicated listening time.

User-Centric Payment Systems (UCPS)

This concept is a shift towards a User-Centric Payment System (UCPS). This system would prioritize the time dedicated to listening, moving away from a passive "click-based" model.

(Related Post: Music Streaming: Why 3rd Party Distributors?)

I asked a few open questions in the video about this:

  • Gaming the System: Could a time-based system be easily manipulated for people to take advantage of and game the system?
  • Defining Interest: Should the debate also consider "time spent" or "time interest" beyond just raw listening time?
  • Affiliate Comparison: I brought up the concept of the Amazon affiliate model, where if an artist sparks interest that leads a listener to spend time with other music, they get credit for bringing the user into that space.

This whole concept is about a potential direct shift of power from the platform to the listener/indie artist.


What Do You Think?

I don't have the answers, but I want to start the discussion! I'm specifically focused on the streaming services right now—not downloads or platforms like Bandcamp.

  • Do you think a User-Centric Payment System (UCPS) based on listening time is a good idea, a bad idea, or just "meh"?
  • How would you define and divide the payout for an artist's popular "parity spike"?

I'll be compiling more responses for future videos! If you want to stay up to date on this discussion, be sure to subscribe to my email list!

Join the project and give your input

* indicates required

Popular

Artwork for the original Candy Land game by Milton Bradley from 1955.

I have a vintage Candy Land game from 1955 by Milton Bradley and I was about to sell it so I thought I would add it to my personal art history course concept I've been doing . I'm going to try and see if I can find out how this game was created, designed and why? Here is what I found out about this game https://candy-land.fandom.com/wiki/Candy_Land_Wiki Candy Land is a board game about children exploring a world made out of candy and other sweets that originally came out in 1949. In every version of the game, there are a group of children that go through Candy Land. In the earliest versions of the game, it was a realistically drawn boy and girl. Drawing of the Candy Land kids I did on my phone ☝ https://board-games-galore.fandom.com/wiki/Candy_Land The game was designed in 1948 by Eleanor Abbott , while she was recovering from polio in San Diego, California. It's rumored that Eleanor also did the original artwork but I didn't find anything that...

The Disco Artwork Of The Bonkers 1978 Parker Brothers Board Game.

I tried to find the origin of the artwork on this vintage board game. But came up short. I got this version of the game " Bonkers! " by Parker Brothers from 1978. I remember the game because of the super disco/burst design. Kinda reminds me of that pinball counting cartoon segment on Sesame Street back in the day where they counted to 12. Which if you remember the song, I always love to point out the people that sing it are  The Pointer Sisters . Ok back to the game. Here is some info I learned about it. Described as a race-style board game designed by Paul J. Gruen who also came up with the game Pay Day and was considered one of the era's top board game designers. And I'm pretty sure when they say designed it's referring to the concept, not the artwork. That seems to be the only thing I can find that talks about the design. I would have liked to learn more about who did the artwork or how it was conceived. The game was released three tim...

Board games.

I thought that was really cool how him getting this old game meant so much to him. This is the Bonkers! game that I'm talking about. -  https://amzn.to/2V0OQfK

Stephen Gilpin: Cartoonist and illustrator - Tom Ray's Art Podcast

Listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS On this podcast episode, I meet Stephen Gilpin . Stephen Gilpin has been working professionally as an illustrator since 2001. He’s illustrated numerous picture books, chapter books, graphic novels, and illustrations for a host of clients including Disney/Hyperion, Simon and Schuster, Harper, MacMillan, Scholastic, and others. Since 2016 he's done a regular comic strip page for Scout Life (Boys' Life) Magazine.  We talk about how Stephen is currently trying to break out with his own comic ideas these days and trying to set their own path. Links Stephen Gilpin's website https://sgilpin.com Stephen Gilpin on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/sparkgilpin 📙 Get my webcomic book "Then This Happened... Going outside again" now on Amazon as an ebook or paperback 📬 Join my email list to get a call out for artists when I'm booking interviews! Join my email list